Pupi Espinoza: I come from a long time trying to understand what happened in the 70 more than the official propaganda, I read books written by members of the Erp and Gorriaran, some things Matini and history of the takeover of Viejobueno battalion by an author who is currently not remember the name who starred in all find the common denominator to insist on justifying and extolling the actions taken by the FARC.
My abiding sense to read what they relate is the enormous political naivete, the underestimation of the firepower of the armed forces and the weakness with they faced the shares.
I find it interesting the proposal of the Blog, what good would come out of places repeated to justify or denigrate what has been done and try to make a protagonist as not just tell you what they thought or looked at the time, but what were the deeper motivations and feelings to risk their lives for an ideal world more just pure voluntarism.
do not think that socioeconomic inequalities are now much deeper at that time? Do not you think that somehow the actions of the guerrillas were shot functional and socio-economic justification of the coup of 76 to Argentina society?
do not think that the theory better and the worse of all or nothing, facilitated the actions repression and the subsequent slaughter of thousands of young people, workers, intellectuals, cadres all valuable much needed today and let the reformatting of this anomie society today?
Is not perish too "crazy" to repeat the same political arguments of the attempted military takeover in Viejobueno Battalion 75, in an attempt to takeover of La Tablada in 89?
are the first questions that I appear before the proposal of the blog.
Best Regards. 18/11/2008 19:04
..................................... .................................................. ...............
. Dear
Florencio:
Perhaps the most profound motivation This blog and all the equipment that accompanies me in the editing and preparation of interview questions, this method is to look for the blog, the answers to these questions yours.
We have time, I do not want to die and you still seem to enjoy good health for your clarity inquisitive.
begin with back in what I consider one of the most blatant accusation with home PC or brunette that has circulated around the PRT-ERP. That the worse the better, or if I play well what you wanted to tell me that the more bad government is better to increase the contradictions in the country or the rich richer and the poor poorer and this would greater awareness among workers and facilitate the revolution. If you do not interpret it decímelo. Sincerely School or tables or in the theoretical lectures that gave us the cros. outlining never heard anyone even the slightest trace of this crude theory that accuses us and has convinced many people that this was our doctrine to operate.
I think it rightly or not, is part of the arsenal of Soviet Stalinism theoretical battle against international Trotskyism. As the PRT-ERP was originally Morenoite Trotskyist organization, it is likely that the Argentine PC in those years was the fiercest fighting powerhouse of defamation and by all means against its bigger favor conpetidor by Cuban, Latin American and the Argentine working class. Absolutely
tell you that we do not we know how much worse it better, as you say you.
All or Nothing otherwise. It is also a book in a cra. I do not remember the name, I think Seoane, but I'm not sure at this point.
And there may be something that nosotroeramos as Che Guevara and Che's favorite slogan was Danton: Audacity, audacity, more audacity.
Here the debate seems to be more difficult because they come consideracions more subjective, more psychological.
But I think something in advance and the answers of your battery broad and heavy cslibre questions, Let us pause, not to tire the reader and follow it, or rather I answer right away as part II.
Thanks for your patience, man.
My abiding sense to read what they relate is the enormous political naivete, the underestimation of the firepower of the armed forces and the weakness with they faced the shares.
I find it interesting the proposal of the Blog, what good would come out of places repeated to justify or denigrate what has been done and try to make a protagonist as not just tell you what they thought or looked at the time, but what were the deeper motivations and feelings to risk their lives for an ideal world more just pure voluntarism.
do not think that socioeconomic inequalities are now much deeper at that time? Do not you think that somehow the actions of the guerrillas were shot functional and socio-economic justification of the coup of 76 to Argentina society?
do not think that the theory better and the worse of all or nothing, facilitated the actions repression and the subsequent slaughter of thousands of young people, workers, intellectuals, cadres all valuable much needed today and let the reformatting of this anomie society today?
Is not perish too "crazy" to repeat the same political arguments of the attempted military takeover in Viejobueno Battalion 75, in an attempt to takeover of La Tablada in 89?
are the first questions that I appear before the proposal of the blog.
Best Regards. 18/11/2008 19:04
..................................... .................................................. ...............
. Dear
Florencio:
Perhaps the most profound motivation This blog and all the equipment that accompanies me in the editing and preparation of interview questions, this method is to look for the blog, the answers to these questions yours.
We have time, I do not want to die and you still seem to enjoy good health for your clarity inquisitive.
begin with back in what I consider one of the most blatant accusation with home PC or brunette that has circulated around the PRT-ERP. That the worse the better, or if I play well what you wanted to tell me that the more bad government is better to increase the contradictions in the country or the rich richer and the poor poorer and this would greater awareness among workers and facilitate the revolution. If you do not interpret it decímelo. Sincerely School or tables or in the theoretical lectures that gave us the cros. outlining never heard anyone even the slightest trace of this crude theory that accuses us and has convinced many people that this was our doctrine to operate.
I think it rightly or not, is part of the arsenal of Soviet Stalinism theoretical battle against international Trotskyism. As the PRT-ERP was originally Morenoite Trotskyist organization, it is likely that the Argentine PC in those years was the fiercest fighting powerhouse of defamation and by all means against its bigger favor conpetidor by Cuban, Latin American and the Argentine working class. Absolutely
tell you that we do not we know how much worse it better, as you say you.
All or Nothing otherwise. It is also a book in a cra. I do not remember the name, I think Seoane, but I'm not sure at this point.
And there may be something that nosotroeramos as Che Guevara and Che's favorite slogan was Danton: Audacity, audacity, more audacity.
Here the debate seems to be more difficult because they come consideracions more subjective, more psychological.
But I think something in advance and the answers of your battery broad and heavy cslibre questions, Let us pause, not to tire the reader and follow it, or rather I answer right away as part II.
Thanks for your patience, man.
0 comments:
Post a Comment